![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
WanderingsRecent Entries | ||
|
|
You are viewing the most recent 25 entries.
4th March 200918th February 2009
: My favorite NY Times article ever
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/busin Toksook Bay! My second Alaskan home. Also- awesome! Current Mood:
13th February 20096th February 2009
:
There once was a girl from AK
but nothing convinced her to stay she went to the city where things were all pretty but finds that she's homesick today The same little girl goes to school in a place that's a little bit cruel but she's got some friends here and some that are queer and also incredibly cool Current Mood:
4th February 2009
: Who woulda thunk?
"When are we gonna have a maximum wage?" -Big Poppa E. Right now. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/us/po Current Mood:
Current Music: Pushing Buttons -Big Poppa E.
3rd February 2009
: I wonder where my dreams will take me tonight
Thoughts circulating in my head : I'm allergic to cherry chapstick. I'm indulging my slightly stalkeresque qualities. Klondike bars aren't as good as they were when I was 6. Dress-up is. Current Mood:
Current Music: Katy Perry- I kissed a girl
11th January 2009
: "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal."
I don't understand why the car companies are investing in electric cars. From what I know about them, they'll go about 100 miles, then need to be charged for 6 hours or so. They're hoping that the families that own two cars will want an electric car as their around town errand car, and have a different one for long distance. Anyone see any problems with this logic? First, whether or not Americans drive an average of 35 miles a day, when choosing a car, they will be wanting to get the best for their money, not good-enough-most-of-the-time for the same money (or even more). And people don't have two cars, one for short distances and one for long, they have two cars for two people (or four, or six, as the case may be), and I think the majority of people won't want one of those cars to be a sort of cripple car, that can only do so much. Also, gas prices are going down, but electricity prices are going up. Not to mention, gas, you can put into your car, and wait to use it when you want it. With an electric car, if you want to make sure it's ready when you want it unexpectedly, you have to keep it plugged in, wasting all sorts of money in electricity. If you want it in the morning, you'll have to go out and plug it in when you go to bed, adding an extra 2 hours of electricity you've waisted, as well as another chore. (I realize that there either is already or will be soon technology that turns off the charger once it's done charging, but it still leeches energy.) Why not invest in developing hybrid technology. We could incorporate better batteries, and become less and less dependent on the oil, until the technology (and infrastructure like electrical outlets in parking lots that run on meters, or something) improved to such a state that it's actually viable. Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like whoever's making these decisions doesn't have a very good idea what they're doing. My roommate, the econ major, suggests having juries make these sorts of decisions. Experts could tell them about different aspects of the decisions, and they could actually focus on this decision (unlike congresspeople and senators who have to learn about so many issues that they can't possibly know much about any of them.) And they would have a better idea how it would impact different Americans, because these juries would almost certainly have more diversity than our government. Current Mood:
25th January 200723rd January 2007
: Uh-Oh
*Utilizes the American English glottal stop in discribing her reaction to the upcoming Linguistics Tri-term test* Current Mood:
21st January 200714th January 2007
: A picture of inside Rose
~ Current Mood:
26th December 200613th December 2006
: Did you know?
The word "ulster" is used more often in the English language than the word "climbed" or "grammar"? Why don't I remember ever hearing it? 6th December 2006
:
There are few sparkling moments of revelation. I don't really believe that the entirety of progress is made during those isolated splotches of inspiration. Instead, there is an underlining fabric of infintesably small moments during which the bulk of mental movement occurs. They are so small, that only an immaterial amount of knowledge can fit inside them, but so numerous that their accumulated mental energy powers our beings.
12th November 2006
: P.S.
I haven't written anything good since I got into college. And I don't forsee that changing anytime soon as long as I keep up my current class schedule. I think... something's wrong here. I don't have a solution. 7th November 20066th November 20065th November 200626th October 200624th October 2006
: Do one thing each day that scares you
I haven't been doing that. I have, however, been doing things that I realized would have scared me before, but don't anymore. I don't think that counts. But what am I afraid of, that I think I should do? 23rd October 200621st October 2006
: On the Subject of the Wealth of Nations as Imagined by Adam Smith
I'm afraid I could answer this essay question rather smartly (though perhaps not particularly intelligently) in one paragraph. I will have to be especially verbose in order to make it four pages. Oh well, as my room mate would say, "'Essay' means 'to try', in French!" 20th October 2006
: Ask and ye shall recieve
Thank you. Current Mood: syearding
19th October 2006
: Thank you, sir, for calling me "young lady."
Today needs to end, and tomorrow needs to be different. Yes. Yes, definately. Current Mood:
18th October 2006
: Did you know?
that while looking at an American bookshelf, you'd tilt your head to the right to read the titles, but while looking at a French bookshelf, you'd tilt it to the left. |
|